£247,590
Penalty imposed
UK GDPR
4 February 2026
Date on the register
UK GDPR
Law relied on
DPA 2018 section 155, UK GDPR Article 5(1)(a)
Online technology and telecoms
Sector
7 actions on the register
In one line
The ICO fined MediaLab.AI, Inc. £247,590 on 4 February 2026 under the UK GDPR.
01The record
- Organisation named
- MediaLab.AI, Inc.
- Action
- Monetary penalty
- Date published
- 4 February 2026
- Register year
- 2026
- Law relied on
- UK GDPR
- Provisions cited
- DPA 2018 section 155, UK GDPR Article 5(1)(a), UK GDPR Article 6, UK GDPR Article 6(1)(a), UK GDPR Article 8, UK GDPR Article 35, UK GDPR Article 35(1)
- Penalty
- £247,590
- Sector on the register
- Online technology and telecoms
- ICO register reference
- 85313
- Register status
- Published on the ICO enforcement register, 4 September 2026
- Notice documents
- 1 PDF published by the ICO
- Sector share of register
- 7 of 216 actions (3%)
- Actions published that year
- 21
- Actions under this law
- 95
- Position on the register
- 200th of 216, oldest first
- Published the same day
- This entry alone
- Rank by penalty size
- 11th of 44 penalties with a published figure
02What happened, and where it sits
MediaLab.AI, Inc. received an ICO monetary penalty on 4 February 2026. The Commissioner acted under the UK General Data Protection Regulation, citing DPA 2018 section 155, UK GDPR Article 5(1)(a), UK GDPR Article 6 and UK GDPR Article 6(1)(a). A fine. The ICO issues a monetary penalty notice setting out the contravention and the sum payable.
The penalty is £247,590. That is the 11th largest of the 44 penalties on this register with a published figure and the 4th largest of the 8 recorded in 2026. UK GDPR penalties are capped at £17.5 million or 4% of total worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher.
MediaLab.AI, Inc. is filed under Online technology and telecoms, which accounts for 7 of the 216 actions on the register (3%). In 2026 the ICO published 21 enforcement actions in total, 10 of them monetary penalties. 95 actions on the register name UK GDPR.
Counted from the oldest entry forward, this is the 200th of 216 actions on the register and the 6th of 7 in Online technology and telecoms. The ICO publishes one document for this action, 1.2 MB in total: "MediaLab.AI, Inc. monetary penalty notice". It is the authority for everything on this page.
03The ICO's own account
£247,590 penalty imposed on MediaLab.AI, Inc. in respect of infringements of Articles 5(1)(a), 6, 8 and 35 UK GDPR. MediaLab operated the Imgur social media platform in the UK prior to 30 September 2025 and allowed children under the age of 13 to access the platform, purportedly subject to a requirement for parental supervision and whilst claiming to rely on the Article 6(1)(a) UK GDPR (consent) lawful basis. However, MediaLab had no means of determining the age of its users and thus no means of ensuring that it obtained parental consent in respect of users under the age of 13, as required by Article 8 UK GDPR due to the fact that MediaLab offered infrormation society services (i.e. the Imgur platform) directly to children in the UK purportedly on the basis of consent. Therefore, MediaLab did not have a valid lawful basis for processing the personal data of children under the age of 13 and thus processed their personal data unlawfully. In addition, MediaLab failed to carry out a DPIA prior to engaging in a form of high risk processing, specifically, processing the personal data of children under the age of 18 where it intended to offer online services to those children, placing MediaLab in breach of Article 35(1) UK GDPR. The period of infringement began on 27 September 2021, when MediaLab acquired Imgur, Inc. and continued until 30 September 2025, when MediaLab implemented a geo-block which prevents individuals in the UK from accessing the Imgur platform. The penalty was reduced from the £393,000 proposed in the NOI dated 10 September 2025 following consideration of MediaLab's representations and updated financial information.
The law behind this action
UK GDPR
The UK GDPR is the data protection regime the ICO enforces against controllers and processors. Its upper tier is capped at £17.5 million or 4% of total worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher.
What a monetary penalty does
A fine. The ICO issues a monetary penalty notice setting out the contravention and the sum payable.
Published notice
- PDFMediaLab.AI, Inc. monetary penalty notice(1.2 MB)
04Nearest entries on the register
| Organisation | Date | Action | Law | Penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reddit, Inc. | 23 Feb 2026 | Monetary penalty | UK GDPR | £14,472,500 |
| LastPass UK Ltd | 20 Nov 2025 | Monetary penalty | UK GDPR | £1,228,283 |
| TikTok Information Technologies UK Limited and TikTok Inc (TikTok) | 15 May 2023 | Monetary penalty | UK GDPR | £12,700,000 |
| Gain Capital UK Limited | 10 Mar 2023 | Reprimand | UK GDPR | - |
| South Staffordshire Plc and South Staffordshire Water Plc | 7 May 2026 | Monetary penalty | UK GDPR | £963,900 |
All Online technology and telecoms actions/All 2026 actions/The full register
05Work out an exposure of your own
Article 83 fine calculator
Estimate upper and lower tier exposure from turnover and infringement type, on the same scale the ICO works to.
How a fine is calculated
The Article 83(2) factors, the turnover caps, and how a regulator gets from a contravention to a number.
The ICO profile
How the UK regulator works post-Brexit, the £17.5M and £8.7M UK GDPR caps, and its divergence from the EU regime.
Provenance and independence
Source: ICO enforcement register (ico.org.uk/action-weve-taken/enforcement/), as published on 4 September 2026. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
GDPRFine.com is an independent tracker of ICO enforcement. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by or connected to the Information Commissioner's Office, and it uses no ICO branding. Where the ICO's own wording is reproduced it is quoted and attributed; everything else on these pages is our own summary of the published record.
The ICO's register held 222 entries on that date. 6 of them are prosecutions of named individuals, with ages and home towns in the ICO's own summary. This tracker indexes organisations, so those 6 are excluded and every count on these pages is out of 216. They remain on the ICO's own register.
An entry says what the Commissioner did on the date shown. It is not a statement about the organisation today, and the ICO can amend or remove a register entry at any time. Amounts and provisions are as published by the ICO; where the published notice does not state a figure or name a provision, these pages say so rather than filling the gap. This entry was read from the register page at https://ico.org.uk/action-weve-taken/enforcement/2026/02/medialabai-inc/.
Register: ico.org.uk/action-weve-taken/enforcement/. Corrections: questions@gdprfine.com.