None
Financial penalty
Reprimand, no fine
26 October 2023
Date on the register
UK GDPR
Law relied on
DPA 2018 section 34, DPA 2018 section 35
Criminal justice
Sector
26 actions on the register
In one line
The ICO issued Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) with a reprimand on 26 October 2023 under the UK General Data Protection Regulation. No financial penalty attaches to it.
01The record
- Organisation named
- Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI)
- Action
- Reprimand
- Date published
- 26 October 2023
- Register year
- 2023
- Law relied on
- UK GDPR
- Provisions cited
- DPA 2018 section 34, DPA 2018 section 35, DPA 2018 section 40
- Penalty
- None (not a financial penalty)
- Sector on the register
- Criminal justice
- ICO register reference
- 17313
- Register status
- Published on the ICO enforcement register, 4 September 2026
- Notice documents
- 1 PDF published by the ICO
- Sector share of register
- 26 of 216 actions (12%)
- Actions published that year
- 80
- Actions under this law
- 95
- Position on the register
- 97th of 216, oldest first
- Published the same day
- 3 actions dated 26 October 2023
02What happened, and where it sits
Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) received an ICO reprimand on 26 October 2023. The Commissioner acted under the UK General Data Protection Regulation, citing DPA 2018 section 34, DPA 2018 section 35 and DPA 2018 section 40. A formal criticism on the public record. A reprimand carries no fine and no order, but it is published and the ICO expects the shortcomings named in it to be fixed.
No sum is attached to this action. Reprimands are corrective, not financial, which is why Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) appears on the register without a figure beside it.
Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) is filed under Criminal justice, which accounts for 26 of the 216 actions on the register (12%). In 2023 the ICO published 80 enforcement actions in total, 37 of them reprimands. 95 actions on the register name UK GDPR.
Counted from the oldest entry forward, this is the 97th of 216 actions on the register and the 11th of 26 in Criminal justice. The ICO published 3 actions on 26 October 2023, so this one was part of a batch: Argentum Data Solutions Ltd (enforcement notice) and Argentum Data Solutions Ltd (monetary penalty). The ICO publishes one document for this action, 147 KB in total: "Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) reprimand". It is the authority for everything on this page.
03The ICO's own account
Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) failed to have appropriate measures in place to prevent unlawful sharing of personal data including criminal data with the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
The law behind this action
UK GDPR
The UK GDPR is the data protection regime the ICO enforces against controllers and processors. Its upper tier is capped at £17.5 million or 4% of total worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher.
What a reprimand does
A formal criticism on the public record. A reprimand carries no fine and no order, but it is published and the ICO expects the shortcomings named in it to be fixed.
Published notice
04Published the same day
| Organisation | Date | Action | Law | Penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Argentum Data Solutions Ltd | 26 Oct 2023 | Enforcement notice | PECR 2003 | - |
| Argentum Data Solutions Ltd | 26 Oct 2023 | Monetary penalty | PECR 2003 | - |
05Nearest entries on the register
| Organisation | Date | Action | Law | Penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chief Constable West Mercia Police and Chief Constable Warwickshire Police | 6 Oct 2023 | Reprimand | UK GDPR | - |
| Ministry of Justice | 8 Sep 2023 | Reprimand | UK GDPR | - |
| Nottinghamshire Police | 21 Jun 2023 | Reprimand | UK GDPR | - |
| Thames Valley Police | 30 May 2023 | Reprimand | UK GDPR | - |
| Surrey Police | 3 Apr 2023 | Reprimand | UK GDPR | - |
All Criminal justice actions/All 2023 actions/The full register
06Work out an exposure of your own
Article 83 fine calculator
Estimate upper and lower tier exposure from turnover and infringement type, on the same scale the ICO works to.
How a fine is calculated
The Article 83(2) factors, the turnover caps, and how a regulator gets from a contravention to a number.
The ICO profile
How the UK regulator works post-Brexit, the £17.5M and £8.7M UK GDPR caps, and its divergence from the EU regime.
Provenance and independence
Source: ICO enforcement register (ico.org.uk/action-weve-taken/enforcement/), as published on 4 September 2026. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
GDPRFine.com is an independent tracker of ICO enforcement. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by or connected to the Information Commissioner's Office, and it uses no ICO branding. Where the ICO's own wording is reproduced it is quoted and attributed; everything else on these pages is our own summary of the published record.
The ICO's register held 222 entries on that date. 6 of them are prosecutions of named individuals, with ages and home towns in the ICO's own summary. This tracker indexes organisations, so those 6 are excluded and every count on these pages is out of 216. They remain on the ICO's own register.
An entry says what the Commissioner did on the date shown. It is not a statement about the organisation today, and the ICO can amend or remove a register entry at any time. Amounts and provisions are as published by the ICO; where the published notice does not state a figure or name a provision, these pages say so rather than filling the gap. This entry was read from the register page at https://ico.org.uk/action-weve-taken/enforcement/2023/10/police-service-of-northern-ireland-psni/.
Register: ico.org.uk/action-weve-taken/enforcement/. Corrections: questions@gdprfine.com.